We present these articles as examples of media bias. Make no mistake–every media owner wants either Trump or Harris to win the election. And these headlines prove that reality. We call these to your attention so that you look beyond the propaganda and realize as much truth as you can discover from other sources and your own common sense. The examples that follow are lies, half truths or misleading in their “big print”.
- HEADLINE: “STOCKS END HIGHER ON FED REMARKS”: This story is technically accurate but only tells part of the reason that stock prices are rising. All the “Bidenomic” indicators are positive. Inflation down, job creation steady, unemployment low, retail sales surging. In short, we have a healthy and growing economy but the current White House administration is not mentioned–only the “Fed”. Biden was, of course, headlined for any negative economic news.
- HEADLINE: ” HARRIS POLICY PLANS TO FACE NEW SCRUTINY”: VP Harris is being criticized for not providing details of her policy plans. This reflects the DNC National Convention where NO candidate dwells on details for an entire policy agenda. Also, when have you ever heard criticism of Trump for not providing details. He has never offered any specifics of any policy ideas. And when pushed he reverts to name calling and threats.
- HEADLINE: “BIDEN ESCAPES PUSH TO TAKE HIM DOWN”: Really? Is that showing respect for a sitting president who has devoted most of his life to public service? Trump commits all kinds of crimes and is NEVER disrespected in the media for any of his shenanigans.
- HEADLINE: “BIDEN CAP ON DRUG COSTS COULD HELP SENIORS SAVE”: This is a perfect example of the newspaper counting on the fact that most people do not read beyond the headline. The article actually says in the first sentence of the first paragraph: “More than a million seniors in the US will save over $1,000 annually beginning in 2025″. Another line says that the $2,000 cap will save over $3.2 million annually for some people. And 12% will save more than $3,000 annually. NOW RE-READ THE HEADLINE AND NOTE THE MISLEADING WORDS.
Comments are closed